Transaction delta by P&L Group Head with drill-down to ledger codes. Click any row to initiate a review. Severity glyphs are visual cues only — the binding logic lives in the assigned prompt template.
FY2025–26
Sync14:32 IST · fresh ✓
SourcePBI · FY26 P&L Daily
CurrencyINR
Default landing canvas. Group Heads collapsed; click chevron or row to expand GL drill-down. Status pills show where each line is in the review lifecycle; the action button changes accordingly.
FilterCycle · Mar 2026 · 12 of 28 lines closed for the period
P&L Line
Actual
Prior
MoM%
YoY%
▸
Revenue
Reviewed
₹ 4,82,00,000
₹ 4,51,00,000
+6.8%
+18.0%
4010Product Revenue — DomesticReviewed
₹ 3,12,00,000
₹ 2,98,00,000
+4.7%
+14.2%
4020Product Revenue — Export
₹ 1,28,00,000
₹ 1,20,00,000
+6.7%
+22.1%
4030Services Revenue
₹ 42,00,000
₹ 33,00,000
+27.3%
+88.0%
▸
COGS · Direct Costs
In progress
₹ 2,94,00,000
₹ 2,71,00,000
+8.4%
+22.0%
5010Direct Materials
₹ 1,84,00,000
₹ 1,61,00,000
+14.2%
+19.8%
5020Contract Manufacturing
₹ 1,10,00,000
₹ 1,10,00,000
+0.0%
+24.5%
5030Freight Inwards
₹ 18,00,000
₹ 14,00,000
+28.5%
+42.0%
▸
Employee Costs
▲ WarnIn progress
₹ 1,12,00,000
₹ 95,00,000
+17.8%
+24.0%
6010Salaries — PermanentReviewed
₹ 78,00,000
₹ 71,00,000
+9.8%
+18.0%
6120Contract Staff● Critical
₹ 21,00,000
₹ 9,00,000
+133.3%
+210.0%
6300Annual Bonus Provision
₹ 13,00,000
₹ 15,00,000
-13.3%
-8.0%
6400Statutory ContributionsReviewed
₹ 8,40,000
₹ 7,60,000
+10.5%
+12.0%
▸
Marketing Expenses
▲ WarnIn progress
₹ 42,00,000
₹ 31,00,000
+35.5%
+12.0%
7010Digital Advertising
₹ 28,00,000
₹ 19,00,000
+47.4%
+18.0%
7020Events & Sponsorships
₹ 8,00,000
₹ 6,00,000
+33.3%
-4.0%
7030Content & PRReviewed
₹ 6,00,000
₹ 6,00,000
+0.0%
+15.0%
▸
G&A · Overhead
Reviewed
₹ 58,00,000
₹ 54,00,000
+7.4%
+9.0%
8100Office RentReviewed
₹ 22,00,000
₹ 22,00,000
+0.0%
+5.0%
8200Office MaintenanceReviewed
₹ 12,40,000
₹ 10,80,000
+14.8%
+34.0%
8300IT & Software SubscriptionsReviewed
₹ 14,20,000
₹ 12,80,000
+10.9%
+22.0%
8400Travel & Conveyance
₹ 9,40,000
₹ 8,40,000
+11.9%
+8.0%
▸
Finance Costs
Not started
₹ 18,00,000
₹ 17,00,000
+5.9%
+4.0%
9100Interest on Term Loan
₹ 14,80,000
₹ 14,20,000
+4.2%
+2.0%
9200Bank Charges
₹ 3,20,000
₹ 2,80,000
+14.3%
+18.0%
▸
Tax Provisions
Reviewed
₹ 24,60,000
₹ 22,10,000
+11.3%
+15.0%
9450GST Input CreditReviewed
₹ 14,80,000
₹ 13,20,000
+12.1%
+11.4%
9500Income Tax ProvisionReviewed
₹ 9,80,000
₹ 8,90,000
+10.1%
+20.0%
Numeric cells use tabular numerals (JetBrains Mono) so values align vertically — critical for scanning financial statements.
Coloured deltas: green = favourable, red = adverse. Glyphs (▲ Warn, ● Critical) signal threshold breaches but stay subtle.
Mode 2 · Embedded Review
Power BI Embedded
Live Power BI report rendered via secure iframe. ACTIVA overlays "Review this line" affordances onto identified GL lines. The downstream review flow is identical to Delta Mode — only the entry point differs.
ReportFY26 P&L Daily
WorkspaceFinance-Prod
Embed AuthService Principal · valid 47m
Iframe sandboxed. Overlay buttons appear on row hover. Click triggers same Review Composer as Delta Mode.
Hover any row → "Review this line" overlay appears. Embed-to-GL mapping is maintained in a config table by the ACTIVA Platform Admin.
Mode 1 · User-Initiated Review
Balance Sheet — March 2026
Position-snapshot review across Assets, Liabilities, and Equity. Click any row to initiate a review. Severity glyphs are visual cues only — the binding logic lives in the assigned prompt template.
As at31 Mar 2026
Sync14:32 IST · fresh ✓
SourcePBI · FY26 BS Daily
CurrencyINR
Position-snapshot canvas. Group Heads (Assets · Liabilities · Equity) collapsed by default; click any row to expand into its constituent BS lines and drill into reviews.
FilterPosition · 31 Mar 2026 · 6 of 23 lines closed for the period
BS Line
Closing
Prior
Δ MoM
Δ YoY
▸
Non-Current Assets
Reviewed
₹ 14.20 Cr
₹ 13.85 Cr
+2.5%
+8.0%
1100Property, Plant & EquipmentReviewed
₹ 9.40 Cr
₹ 9.18 Cr
+2.4%
+6.2%
1200Intangible AssetsReviewed
₹ 3.10 Cr
₹ 3.02 Cr
+2.6%
+11.4%
1300Long-Term InvestmentsReviewed
₹ 1.70 Cr
₹ 1.65 Cr
+3.0%
+8.5%
▸
Current Assets
▲ WarnIn progress
₹ 8.92 Cr
₹ 7.41 Cr
+20.4%
+34.2%
2100Inventories
₹ 2.18 Cr
₹ 1.94 Cr
+12.4%
+18.6%
2200Trade Receivables● Critical
₹ 4.21 Cr
₹ 3.18 Cr
+32.4%
+58.0%
2300Cash & Cash Equivalents
₹ 2.53 Cr
₹ 2.29 Cr
+10.5%
+14.8%
▸
Equity
Reviewed
₹ 11.40 Cr
₹ 10.92 Cr
+4.4%
+12.1%
3100Share CapitalReviewed
₹ 5.00 Cr
₹ 5.00 Cr
+0.0%
+0.0%
3200Retained EarningsReviewed
₹ 6.40 Cr
₹ 5.92 Cr
+8.1%
+22.4%
▸
Non-Current Liabilities
₹ 5.80 Cr
₹ 6.10 Cr
-4.9%
-8.5%
4100Long-Term Borrowings
₹ 4.80 Cr
₹ 5.10 Cr
-5.9%
-10.2%
4200Deferred Tax Liabilities
₹ 1.00 Cr
₹ 1.00 Cr
+0.0%
+5.2%
▸
Current Liabilities
▲ WarnIn progress
₹ 9.32 Cr
₹ 7.04 Cr
+32.4%
+48.2%
5100Short-Term Borrowings● Critical
₹ 3.42 Cr
₹ 2.18 Cr
+56.9%
+78.2%
5200Trade Payables
₹ 4.85 Cr
₹ 4.21 Cr
+15.2%
+21.4%
5300Other Current Liabilities
₹ 1.05 Cr
₹ 0.65 Cr
+61.5%
+82.6%
Balance equation check · Assets ₹ 23.12 Cr = Liabilities ₹ 15.12 Cr + Equity ₹ 11.40 Cr — out of balance by ₹ 3.40 Cr (likely intercompany clearing pending). Top variance lines flagged for review by the assigned prompt templates.
CFO Authoring Surface
Refex Financial Engine
Your Power BI P&L hierarchy is the canvas. Each row shows the number of prompts authored, the stakeholders responsible, and whether the line has full coverage. Click any row to drill into its prompts; create new prompts directly from any Group Head or GL code.
P&L Hierarchy · FY 2025–26
Source · Tally → Power BI · 47 GL codes · 22 active prompts · 8 group heads
Search GL or group…
Sort · P&L order
Group Head · GLActual MTDPromptsStakeholdersStatusAction
P&L hierarchy mirrors your Power BI matrix exactly — same rows, same hierarchy, same numbering. Click any Group Head to expand its GL codes; click any GL row to see its prompts inline. Click any prompt in the inline list to open the editor on a full page. Click [Manage] / [View] for the matrix-level edit view, or [+ Create] on uncovered rows.
Back to hierarchyRefex Financial Engine›Employee Costs›GL 6120 Contract Staff›PRP-014Contract Staff — L2 Override · v3
1
Step 1
Identify
2
Step 2
Trigger
3
Step 3
Stakeholders
4
Step 4
Schedule
5
Step 5
Body & activate
PRP-014Editing Contract Staff — L2 Override · v3 · active · 4 sample runs · 1 sent · 30d
Identify the prompt
Pick a starting template (or start blank), point this prompt at a Group Head and Ledger Head, name it, and set its severity tier.
Start from template
PRP-TMPL-001Inheriting body, questions, evidence list
Name *
Group Head *
Ledger Head *Selecting a specific ledger creates an L2 override on top of any L1 group rule.
Severity *
InfoWarning● Critical
When should it fire?
Select one or more comparators. Multiple conditions are ORed — any one is enough to trigger the prompt.
2.5σ above 24-mo avg+180% vs budget2nd largest in groupConcentration risk: 1 new vendor = ~₹ 8 LYoY: +210%
Refex AI · Insert
Hi Priya,
The Contract Staff ledger (GL 6120) breached its L2 override threshold this period — flagging it for your review. Refex AI has analyzed the movement and surfaced the headline figures below; the full narrative and follow-up questions follow.
📐 KPI block · auto-bound to GL 6120 · March 2026
Actual
₹ 21.0 L
Prior
₹ 9.0 L
MoM
+133%
YoY
+210%
vs Budget
+180%
% of Group
18.7%
✦ Refex AI · narrative summary
Contract Staff costs rose +133% month-on-month to ₹ 21.0 L, breaching both the L2 ledger threshold (25%) and the L1 group ceiling (10%). The spike is driven primarily by new vendor onboarding (~₹ 8 L) and rate revisions in two existing engagements (~₹ 4 L). YoY trajectory of +210% indicates a structural shift rather than a one-time event. The actual is 180% above budget and 2.5σ above the 24-month rolling average. At 18.7% of the Employee Costs group, this line is now the second-largest contributor.
📈 6-Month Trend · GL 6120 · ₹ Lakh
📊 Driver Decomposition · Prior → Actual
Follow-up Questions
What specific business need triggered the new vendor onboarding this period?
Are the rate revisions for the two existing engagements supported by approved variation orders or contract amendments?
Confirm or revise the forecast for Apr–Jun 2026 given this structural shift.
Chandra Mouli · Chief Financial Officer · REFEX Industries Sent via ACTIVA · The Financial Actionable Intelligence Platform
Also share via
Response due Mon, 18 May 2026 · 18:00 IST17h 42m remaining
Review the Contract Staff cost variance — March 2026
GL 6120
Contract Staff costs rose 133% MoM driven by new vendor onboarding and rate revisions…
₹ 21.0 L
+133%
+210%
17h 42m
Critical
☆
CM
Chandra Mouli
CFO · via ACTIVA
Review the Marketing spend variance — March 2026
GL 7010
Digital advertising spend up 47% MoM; investigate channel attribution and ROAS…
₹ 28.0 L
+47.4%
+18.0%
2d 4h
Warning
☆
SC
Suresh Iyer
Finance Controller · via ACTIVA
Review the COGS variance vs Budget — March 2026
GL 5000
Direct material cost exceeded budget by 12% — verify rate revisions with procurement…
₹ 2.94 Cr
+8.4%
+22.0%
2d 18h
Warning
☆
CM
Chandra Mouli
CFO · returned for revision
Re: Review the G&A overhead variance — Feb 2026
GL 8200
Need additional detail on facility lease escalation — please attach the renewal letter…
₹ 12.4 L
+15.2%
+6.8%
3d 6h
Warning
Double-click a row to open the review ·
Enter on a selected row also opens it ·
Esc closes
List → Detail navigation: the recipient lands here on entering My Reviews. Each row is a queued review request from ACTIVA. Double-click opens the review email with full Delta context and structured response form.
Responses Received
2 responses awaiting your action · accept · return for revision · or ask clarification
Search responses…
Sort · Responded ↓
From responderSubject · GLActualΔ MoMΔ YoYRespondedSeverity
Which raw material categories drove the +8.4% MoM spike — what is the unit price vs volume split?
RK Ravi Krishnan · yesterday 16:48
Steel and copper drove ~70% of the spike. Roughly 60% price (commodity rally — LME steel +14% over the month) and 40% volume (Q4 build for the Goa plant scaled earlier than planned). Detailed sub-breakdown in attached XLS.
Are commodity hedges in place for the next two quarters? If yes, summarise the coverage.
RK Ravi Krishnan · yesterday 16:48
Yes — 50% of steel exposure hedged through 31 Aug 2026 at avg ₹62.4K/MT (treasury contract REF-FY26-H07). No copper hedge currently; recommend treasury review given continued LME volatility.
Recommend whether procurement strategy needs to change for Q1.
RK Ravi Krishnan · yesterday 16:48
Two changes: (a) consolidate steel buy to 2 mills from 5 — better pricing on volume commitments, draft term sheet ready; (b) move copper from spot to 3-month forwards for Q1 — supplier outreach started this week. Both for CFO sign-off.
What specific business need triggered the new vendor onboarding this period?
PM Priya Menon · today 11:24
The Bangalore product team requested 6 contract specialists for the Q1 push on the new commerce platform. Procurement onboarded TechBridge Consultants (new vendor) and AcceleraTalent (existing tier-2) to meet the timeline. Decision was made at the Jan 28 hiring review; documented in HR-EXEC-2026-04.
Are the rate revisions for the two existing engagements supported by approved variation orders or contract amendments?
PM Priya Menon · today 11:24
Partially. Engagement #1 (Mindshare Labs · 4 specialists) has a signed variation order dated 22 Feb. Engagement #2 (BlueWave Tech · 2 specialists) is verbal-only pending paperwork; procurement is following up this week. Will share both signed copies once finalised.
Confirm or revise the forecast for Apr–Jun 2026 given this structural shift.
Forecast is missing — clarification recommended before close
Showing 2 of 2 responses · sorted by responded ↓ · clearing this queue is the CFO's day-end goal
Responses Received: the CFO's response-triage workspace. Every submitted response lands here for accept · return · ask clarification · escalate. Accepting moves the review to Closed with the full Q&A archived.
Snoozed Reviews
3 snoozed · auto-restored on scheduled date · sorted by wake date
Search snoozed…
Sort · Wake date ↑
FromSubject · GLActualΔ MoMΔ YoYWakesSeverity
☆
CM
Chandra Mouli
CFO · via ACTIVA
Review the Travel & Conveyance MoM jump — Feb 2026
✓ Closed · full Q&A archive · R-2026-02-0089Sent 06 Feb · Responded 09 Feb · Accepted 14 May · 8d cycle
Which raw material categories drove the +14.2% MoM increase, and what was the price-vs-volume split?
RK Ravi Krishnan · 09 Feb 11:42
Two categories: steel (~55% of spike, primarily price — LME steel +12% Jan→Feb) and copper (~30%, mixed price/volume from a 1-time Q4 build). Remaining 15% from sundry consumables. Detailed line-item breakdown in COGS_5010_Breakdown.xlsx.
Is the vendor rate revision documented and approved per procurement policy?
RK Ravi Krishnan · 09 Feb 11:42
Yes — primary steel vendor (Mahalakshmi Steels) submitted revision ref VR-2026-014, approved by Procurement Committee on 28 Jan. Copy attached. Copper revisions still on spot.
Do we have a hedge strategy or long-term contract proposal to mitigate future spikes?
RK Ravi Krishnan · 09 Feb 11:42
3-year LTC with Mahalakshmi Steels signed 12 Feb — locks 60% of steel volume at avg ₹61.8K/MT with quarterly index review. Copper hedge proposal drafted for treasury — see Copper_Hedge_Proposal_v1.pdf.
CM
Chandra Mouli · CFO · accepted 14 May 16:30
Comprehensive response. LTC is the right call — please present Q1 savings projection at next board pack. Copper hedge: forward to treasury for review and report back end of Q1.
☆
PM
Priya Menon
CHRO
Re: Statutory bonus provision — Feb 2026
GL 6300✓ 2/2 archived
Seasonal — bonus posted as per policy. Accepted, no further action.
₹ 15.0 L
+82%
+3.4%
12 May
Accepted
✓ Closed · full Q&A archive · R-2026-02-0103Sent 03 Mar · Responded 05 Mar · Accepted 12 May · seasonal
Is the bonus provision within policy and consistent with the FY26 budget for statutory bonus?
PM Priya Menon · 05 Mar 09:12
Yes. ₹ 15.0 L is the full FY26 statutory bonus liability, computed at 8.33% on basic of all eligible employees (₹ 1.80 Cr). Consistent with FY26 HR budget line HR-22 (₹ 15.5 L approved). Lower than budget due to attrition in eligible cohort.
Confirm the timing — is this a one-time Feb posting or will it recur?
PM Priya Menon · 05 Mar 09:12
One-time annual provision as per Payment of Bonus Act. Always posted in February following statutory close. Will recur in Feb 2027 with the FY27 cohort. This is the same posting pattern as Feb 2025 (₹ 13.8 L).
CM
Chandra Mouli · CFO · accepted 12 May 10:30
Confirmed seasonal posting per policy. Adding GL 6300 to the seasonal-suppression schedule for Feb so this doesn't fire again next year — please coordinate with Suresh on the rule update.
★
AK
Anita Kapoor
CMO
Re: Marketing % of Revenue ceiling breach — Jan 2026
GL 7000✓ 3/3 archived
Brand campaign required to defend market share; Board approved exception until Q2 close…
₹ 58.0 L
+38%
+24.0%
28 Apr
Escalated
↗ Escalated & closed · full Q&A archive · R-2026-01-0076Sent 09 Feb · Responded 13 Feb · Escalated to Board 22 Feb · Closed 28 Apr
What drove Marketing spend to 18.4% of revenue, breaching the 12% L1 ceiling?
AK Anita Kapoor · 13 Feb 14:08
Q4 brand defence campaign in response to competitor (Sunrise Energy) regional launch in TN and KA. Three components: ATL print/OOH (₹ 22 L), digital paid (₹ 18 L), influencer activation (₹ 18 L). Approved at January marketing committee with FY26 budget reallocation from Q2 to Q1.
Is this a one-off or sustained shift in Marketing % of Revenue?
AK Anita Kapoor · 13 Feb 14:08
Sustained through Q2 — campaign continues into April/May for the new EV charger SKU launch. After Q2, marketing returns to baseline 9–11% of revenue. Quarterly breakdown attached in Marketing_FY26_Plan_v3.xlsx.
What revenue uplift is expected to justify the ceiling exception?
AK Anita Kapoor · 13 Feb 14:08
Projected ₹ 6.2 Cr incremental revenue in H1 FY26 from defended market share + new EV launch — implied ROAS of 4.2×. Tracking against this milestone-by-milestone with weekly leads/conversion dashboard shared with sales.
CM
Chandra Mouli · CFO · escalated to Board 22 Feb · closed 28 Apr 17:50
Material exception above 12% ceiling — escalated to Board per policy §5.2. Board approved 22 Feb (resolution B-FY26-04). Closing with the resolution attached; tracking ROAS quarterly. Anita to present milestone metrics at the May board meeting.
☆
CM
Chandra Mouli
CFO · cancelled
Re: Sundry expense anomaly — Jan 2026
GL 8920
Cancelled: posting reversed in Tally after data entry correction by accounts team.
DIGEST
G&A overhead, Marketing % of revenue, Direct material — see thread for details.
—
—
—
9 May
System
Showing 9 of 12 reviews · Load more · sorted by received ↓
Review Inbox: every dispatched review, response, and ACTIVA system note in one queue. Filter chips narrow by severity (Critical, Warning, Overdue) to focus on what needs attention.
Starred
3 starred · personal bookmarks · do not affect SLA
Search starred…
Sort · Date starred ↓
FromSubject · GLActualΔ MoMΔ YoYStarredStatus
★
CM
Chandra Mouli
CFO · via ACTIVA
⏱ Overdue · Re: G&A overhead variance — Feb 2026
GL 8200
Response was due 3d 6h ago · escalated to secondary owner per SLA ladder.
₹ 12.4 L
+15.2%
+6.8%
11 May
Overdue
★
AK
Anita Kapoor
CMO
Re: Marketing % of Revenue ceiling breach — Jan 2026
GL 7000
Reference response · use as template for Mar 2026 review of same line.
₹ 58.0 L
+38%
+24.0%
28 Apr
Closed
★
SI
Suresh Iyer
Finance Controller
Re: EBITDA margin floor breach — Dec 2025
EBITDA
Board pack reference — full analysis of one-time costs and recovery plan.
16.8%
-1.2pp
-3.4pp
10 Jan
Closed
Star any review to keep a personal bookmark — useful for board prep
Starred: personal bookmarks for reviews you want to keep top-of-mind — used for board prep, audit defense, and reference templates.
Sent
28 sent · review dispatches you authored · current FY
Search sent…
Sort · Sent date ↓
ToSubject · GLActualΔ MoMΔ YoYSentStatus
☆
PM
to Priya Menon
CHRO
Review the Contract Staff cost variance — March 2026
GL 6120● 0/3 answered
Opened 14:53 · awaiting response · SLA 1 business day
What specific business need triggered the new vendor onboarding this period?
Are the rate revisions for the two existing engagements supported by approved variation orders or contract amendments?
Confirm or revise the forecast for Apr–Jun 2026 given this structural shift.
Responder will see and fill these fields when they open the review from their Review Inbox. 0 of 3 complete.
☆
AK
to Anita Kapoor
CMO
Review the Marketing spend variance — March 2026
GL 7010● 0/3 answered
Not yet opened · reminder due in 4h if unread
₹ 28.0 L
+47.4%
+18.0%
11:20
Delivered
✦ Follow-up Q&A · 3 questions · not yet openedReminder due in 4 hours
Was the spike driven by a specific campaign, channel re-allocation, or vendor change?
Confirm whether the vendor concentration risk (top-3 > 60%) is addressed in Q1 planning.
Provide a revised marketing % of revenue forecast for Q2 2026.
Responder will see and fill these fields when they open the review from their Review Inbox. 0 of 3 complete.
☆
RK
to Ravi Krishnan
Procurement Head
Re: COGS variance vs Budget — March 2026
GL 5000✓ 3/3 answered
Forwarded from Suresh · opened 10:14 · response submitted
₹ 2.94 Cr
+8.4%
+22.0%
Yesterday
Responded
✦ Follow-up Q&A · 3 questions · 3 answered · pending CFO reviewResponded by Ravi Krishnan · yesterday 16:48
Which raw material categories drove the +8.4% MoM spike — what is the unit price vs volume split?
RK Ravi Krishnan
Steel and copper drove ~70% of the spike. Roughly 60% price (commodity rally — LME steel +14% over the month) and 40% volume (Q4 build for the Goa plant scaled earlier than planned). Detailed sub-breakdown in attached XLS.
Are commodity hedges in place for the next two quarters? If yes, summarise the coverage.
RK Ravi Krishnan
Yes — 50% of steel exposure hedged through 31 Aug 2026 at avg ₹62.4K/MT (treasury contract REF-FY26-H07). No copper hedge currently; recommend treasury review given continued LME volatility.
Recommend whether procurement strategy needs to change for Q1.
RK Ravi Krishnan
Two changes: (a) consolidate steel buy to 2 mills from 5 — better pricing on volume commitments, draft term sheet ready; (b) move copper from spot to 3-month forwards for Q1 — supplier outreach started this week. Both for CFO sign-off.
☆
PM
to Priya Menon
CHRO · returned
Re: G&A overhead variance — Feb 2026
GL 8200◐ 2/3 answered · returned
Need facility lease renewal letter attached
₹ 12.4 L
+15.2%
+6.8%
14 May
Returned
✦ Follow-up Q&A · 3 questions · 2 answered · returned for revisionReturned by Chandra Mouli · 14 May 11:20
What drove the unexpected facility cost increase this month?
PM Priya Menon
Lease renewal effective Feb 1 — ground floor expansion + new HVAC service contract added. Renewal was approved last quarter but cost only hit P&L this month.
Is the increase one-time or recurring? Confirm the 12-month run-rate impact.
PM Priya Menon
Recurring. Run-rate impact ~₹ 1.8 L/month vs prior baseline — total annualised ~₹ 22 L. Already in FY26 budget approved Dec 2025.
Attach the renewal letter and updated lease terms for the audit file.
PM Priya Menon(no response submitted)
Chandra Mouli: Returned — please attach the lease renewal letter and the HVAC service contract before this can be accepted.
Showing 4 of 28 sent · Load more
Sent: review dispatches you (or ACTIVA on your behalf) have sent. Status column shows delivery state on the recipient end.
Drafts
2 drafts · not yet dispatched · auto-saved
Search drafts…
Sort · Last edited ↓
To (draft)Subject · GLActualΔ MoMΔ YoYEditedStatus
☆
VR
to Vikram Rao
VP Sales · draft
Review the Revenue MoM decline — March 2026
GL 4000
Draft · waiting for additional context from sales ops before dispatch
₹ 4.82 Cr
+6.8%
+18.0%
13:22
Draft
☆
FH
to Facilities Head
Admin · draft
Review the Office Maintenance YoY jump — Q4
GL 8300
Draft · escalation note in progress; verifying repair quotes from facilities team
₹ 6.8 L
+4.1%
+34.0%
Yesterday
Draft
Double-click to continue editing · drafts auto-save every 30 seconds
Drafts: in-progress dispatches not yet sent. Used when the reviewer wants to gather context before initiating the formal review.
Back to list
📥
⏱
📁
🏷
✉
⋯
1 of 4 · ← →
Opened via double-click from the Action Required list. Single-use magic link from the dispatch email lands the recipient on this same view if they came from outside the app.
Review the Contract Staff cost variance — March 2026
Action Required● CriticalACTIVA
CM
Chandra Mouli<cfo@pi-one.com>via ACTIVA
to Priya Menon (CHRO),
cc Suresh Iyer (Finance Controller), audit-trail@pi-one.com
Review ID · R-2026-03-0142 | Generated by Claude Sonnet (temp 0.2) | Template · Contract Staff L2 v3
Sat, 16 May · 14:48 IST
17h 42m to respond
Hi Priya,
Our P&L review for March flagged a material variance in GL 6120 Contract Staff. Since you are the designated owner for Employee Costs, ACTIVA has assembled the data and routed this for your explanation. Please review the delta below and respond by the SLA window.
GL 6120Contract Staff · Employee CostsPeriod · March 2026
Actual
₹ 21.0 L
Mar 2026
Prior
₹ 9.0 L
Feb 2026
Delta · MoM
+133%
+₹ 12.0 L
Delta · YoY
+210%
vs Mar 2025
vs Budget
+180%
Budget ₹ 7.5 L
% of Group
18.7%
2nd largest
6-Month Trend · ₹ LakhOct → Mar
ACTIVA AI Narrative
Contract Staff costs rose +133% month-on-month to ₹ 21.0 L, breaching both the L2 ledger threshold (25%) and the L1 group ceiling (10%). The spike appears to be driven by new vendor onboarding (~₹ 8 L) and rate revisions in two existing engagements (~₹ 4 L). The YoY trajectory of +210% indicates a structural shift rather than a one-time event, and the actual is now 2.5σ above the 24-month rolling average.
To close the review, please address the following three questions:
1.
What specific business need triggered the new vendor onboarding in March?
2.
Are the rate revisions on the two existing engagements supported by approved variation orders or contract amendments?
3.
Please confirm or revise the Contract Staff forecast for Apr–Jun 2026 in light of this structural shift.
Supporting evidence (vendor POs, variation orders, headcount roster delta for Feb→Mar) should be attached with your response.
Thanks,
— Chandra
activa.
Chandra Mouli · Chief Financial Officer · REFEX Industries
Sent via ACTIVA · The Financial Actionable Intelligence Platform · This is a structured review request — your response will be captured and audited.
What specific business need triggered the new vendor onboarding?
Minimum 50 characters0 / 50
Are the rate revisions supported by approved variation orders?
Minimum 50 characters0 / 50
Forecast for Apr–Jun 2026?
Minimum 50 characters0 / 50
Attach evidence ·PDF / XLSX / PNG · Max 25 MB each
Draft · auto-saved 14:51 · response will be sent to Chandra Mouli + audit trail
Save Draft
My Queue · Active Reviews
In Progress
Reviews you've initiated that are mid-flight — narratives generated, awaiting owner response or pending re-run. The row action depends on the lifecycle state; tap any row to open the Review Canvas.
FilterCycle · Mar 2026 · oldest is 2d 8h old
Review · GL Line
Owner
Actual
Δ MoM
SLA Remaining
6120Contract Staff cost spike● Critical
PM Priya Menon · CHRO
₹ 21.0 L
+133%
17h 42m
7010Digital Advertising variance▲ Warn
AK Anita Kapoor · CMO
₹ 28.0 L
+47.4%
2d 4h
5000COGS variance vs Budget▲ Warn
RK Ravi Krishnan · Procurement
₹ 2.94 Cr
+8.4%
2d 18h
In Progress queue: every review for which a narrative has been dispatched but no final owner response has been accepted. SLA column counts down in business hours; rows turn red at < 25% remaining.
My Queue · Sent reviews
Sent
Reviews dispatched to owners, currently awaiting their first read receipt or first response. Once an owner opens the narrative, the review moves into In Progress. Use this queue to chase unread items.
Sent queue: reviews you (or ACTIVA on your behalf) have dispatched but not yet closed. Read-receipt status shows whether the owner has actually opened the narrative.
My Queue · Closed reviews
Closed
Accepted, cancelled, or escalated reviews from this financial year. Read-only archive — useful for audit defense, trend analysis, and reference precedents. Every closed review carries a CFO comment.
FilterShowing 6 of 42 · FY 2025–26 to date · retained 7 yrs per policy
Review · GL Line
Owner
Actual
Δ MoM
Closed
Outcome
CFO Comment
5010COGS material cost spike
RK Ravi Krishnan
₹ 1.84 Cr
+14.2%
14 May
Accepted
Vendor rate revision approved; long-term contract in place. Acceptable for FY.
6300Statutory bonus provision
PM Priya Menon
₹ 15.0 L
+82%
12 May
Accepted
Seasonal — bonus posted as per policy. No further action needed.
7000Marketing % of Revenue ceiling▲ Warn
AK Anita Kapoor
₹ 58.0 L
+38%
28 Apr
Escalated
Escalated to Board; brand campaign approved as exception until Q2 close. Re-review 30 Jun.
8920Sundry expense anomaly
CM Chandra Mouli
₹ 0
—
22 Apr
Cancelled
Posting reversed in Tally after data entry correction. No real exception.
Concentration explained by enterprise mega-deal; diversification plan attached for FY27.
Closed queue: showing 6 of 42 reviews from FY 2025–26 to date. The CFO Comment column captures the acceptance rationale — appears only on closed records, never on in-flight reviews.
Refex Financial Engine · Library
Prompt Library
Every prompt authored through the Refex Financial Engine. Click any row (Grid) or card (Card) to drill into its full version history with effective windows, diffs, and audit trail. Sort by any column header.
Library shows all prompts authored across Group Heads, Ledger Heads, and seasonal windows. Each card surfaces full version history with effective dates so you can see when a rule changed and what was active during any past period.
Prompt versions · audit trail
PRP-014Contract Staff — L2 Override
4 versions·spanning 123 days·2 authors·1 production dispatch
Showing version
v3 · active
12 Apr 2026 → present · 36 days active · authored by Chandra Mouli · CFO
Review the {{group_name}} line item {{gl_code}} ({{gl_name}}) for {{period}}.
Actual: ₹{{actual_amount}}. Prior: ₹{{prior_amount}}.
MoM: {{mom_pct}}% · YoY: {{yoy_pct}}% · vs Budget: {{vs_budget_pct}}%.
Address {{primary_stakeholder_name}} ({{primary_stakeholder_role}}). CC: {{cc_stakeholders}}.
Ask:
1. What triggered this movement?
2. Are engagements supported by approved POs / variations?
3. Confirm or revise forecast for next quarter.
Lifecycle activity
12 Apr 2026 · 09:18Activated by Chandra Mouli · CFO
18 Apr 2026 · 14:42Sample run · synthetic scenario · output reviewed by Chandra Mouli
22 Apr 2026 · 11:05Sample run · Feb 2026 replay · output reviewed by Priya Menon
03 May 2026 · 08:30Sample run · Mar 2026 replay · output reviewed by Chandra Mouli
07 May 2026 · 16:18Sample run · Custom scenario · output reviewed by Chandra Mouli
14 May 2026 · 14:32First production dispatch · narrative R-2026-05-0089 sent to Priya Menon · CHRO
Test & preview · sandbox
PRP-014
Contract Staff — L2 Override
v3 · draft
Replay this prompt against historical periods of GL 6120 Contract Staff as seen by Priya Menon · CHRO. No email is sent and no audit trail is written. Pick a period below to see what the dispatched review would have looked like.
Group headEmployee Costs
›
Ledger head6120 Contract Staff
·
Stakeholder under reviewPMPriya Menon · CHRO
·
RuleL2 Override · MoM > 25%
Replay against period
As Priya will receive it
CM
Chandra Mouli · CFO via ACTIVA
Today · 14:48 IST · to Priya Menon · CHRO
● Critical
Review the Contract Staff cost variance — March 2026
GL6120 · Contract Staff
Actual / Prior₹ 21.0 L · ₹ 9.0 L
MoM / YoY+133% · +210%
Respond byMon, 18 May 2026 · 18:00 IST
ACTIVA narrative
Contract Staff costs rose +133% month-on-month to ₹ 21.0 L, breaching both the L2 ledger threshold (25%) and the L1 group ceiling (10%). The spike is driven primarily by new vendor onboarding (~₹ 8 L) and rate revisions in two existing engagements (~₹ 4 L). YoY trajectory of +210% indicates a structural shift rather than a one-time event. The actual is 180% above budget and 2.5σ above the 24-month rolling average. At 18.7% of the Employee Costs group, this line is now the second-largest contributor.
Visuals attached
6-month trend
Driver waterfall
Context strip
Follow up
What triggered this movement?
Are engagements supported by approved POs / variations?
Confirm or revise forecast for next quarter.
Preview · no dispatch · no audit log entry written